Are you asking for “What would an improved version of pages 19 to 24 of the BoK look like?”
Or
“What would an improved section on the page of the big CIC website that describes what’s in each section of the BoK Look like for chapter 2?”
Wrt the BoK I think it’s fine (sic) as it stands. It isn’t (sic) anything I would write.
For example I don’t see the description of “value generation and value creation, & BAU & change” as correct.
For me there is investment which is transformation of capital - it mostly happens during periods of change with a view to generating revenue that mostly happens in a period of business as usual. Both change and business as usual are generating value (by consuming capital). One in the short term and one in long term, one as revenue one as potential for revenue .
Also during BAU depreciation is happening in the sense of tax adjustment allowed for the exhaustion of capital assets that wear-out So need to replace which is also a change that maintains the status quo (I E no change!).
There is more that could be contrasted.
It’s impossible to create a single description that fits everybody’s definitions.
One that is sufficient and concrete enough against which to juxtapose an organisations local understanding is good
It is a starter for an organisation wishing to embark on a journey of improvement or and audit of its current capabilities to use as foundation
⅘¢
