Why advocate for contributions to be made in a PowerPoint presentation and not in posts following this thread?
PowerPoint is a good place to present conclusions . A lousy tool for the stimulation of debate that exposes dimensions across which a frame is placed to include and exclude topics based on needs and or wants.
I strongly suggest that further conversation around the questions is encouraged within the forum where it’s visibility and design objective ‘to foster debate’ gives a better opportunity for a good journey than a tool designed to present the any conclusion(s).
Using the forum develops the habit amongst the membership to contribute to the community 🙂 which when it reaches critical mass will have beneficial outcomes for the Community Interest Company’s (continued) existence 🙂
To make addressing the question above a bit easier:
The Suggestion of best (?!) one liner is
To which we have seen a fair amount of concerned questioning of the use of “strategy to delivery” - So maybe it isn’t the best one line definition only a candidate as yet unrefined.
Given the challenge to the phrase “delivering strategy” - which I have commented in other threads could be considered as equivalent to “integrated governance” - and I don’t know if I’ve said it elsewhere so I’ll say it here … I express the whole topic as the Care Of Capital
I ™'d it long ago and wrote about in
https://www.logicalmodel.net/t/book/c4c/c4c.pdf
Page 8 repeats UNreliably that Drucker (is inaccurately reputed to have) said “Culture eats Strategy for breakfast”.
The error in attribution does not diminish the significance of the words.
I agree BIG is an ‘approach to strategy delivery’. I equate Strategy Delivery to almost matching Integrated Governance (which is a better but still insufficient to scription of the need) - SO I suggest the need is a Curation Of Culture within the context of shared endeavours .
What’s shared is only now emerging in our understanding as the planet.
The disruption to traditional values of ethics, traditional institutions and mechanisms of society that have been caused by the incessant and pervasive rise of digital means to conduct every aspect of life needs evolved guidance that is equal to the evolution of context.
That isn’t just business but it is all things that are business like.
So in asking the question about the definition it highlights for me that the word BUSINESS is inappropriate limiting frame of reference.
For me BIG is a useful vehicle which moves the conversation in a useful direction But BIG is not itself complete nor is it aimed at the next appropriate waypoint in humanities journey.
3¢
